General figure Frank Custa Found in important hours after publishing their last communications on networks, in which Youtubber He acknowledged that he had no cancer, he had no animal training, and in general, he would be a mockery of his life – and then refused – a “serious problem he is based on a mockery of his life. Mitomania and ego ”.
However, as he explained in a live, these words They were pronounced under the insistence Order Stop “harassing” To whom he and his family are subject to, the truth is, Frank de la jungla, who Has already announced legal proceedings Against his ex -cooperation and others who accused him of, other than the other “Transportation of animals And wildlife, “still involved in controversy.
In recent days, many personalities have established themselves about the plight of Frank on social networks. In the case ElectrocardOvarian He Streamer He pointed out that the herbetologist has “done wrong things” and he does not hesitate to leave “Homemade” In order to admit animals to your sanctuary with the intention of improving your living conditions. “He is always against what he protected,” Calician pointed.
In the same row, canino expert Thomm Mueller, is best known Ninja Scadi, Consider this fact that the Cuesta is “serious lack”, because it doubts its important position for buying animals. “This is unforgivable. You can justify it by saying that it is good for you for your economic activity, but it is not fair, ”Scadi explains.
“Frank has no sanctuary”
In his last YouTube video, the InfluenceQuestioned a natural enthusiast who protected a few months ago ”Give a host to give education Despite his ideological contradictions for dogs, such as bull fighting, he presented the reasons that led to remain silent about the recent events. “You You can’t be an animal guardian and lover and can not protect the bull fight ”, Abunda Scadi.
In this context, the animal welfare, Jui’s former Husband, argued that he had dragged “many problems” in his life, and for this reason, he decided to remain silent so far: “I have never been done to be on the ground. It seems to be dishonest. “
In spite of this, the Frenchman did not want to ignore the controversial statements of the Cyta’s controversy on the sanctuary, in which he admitted that he had legally purchased the animals because it was personally concerned about him. “I visited animal sanctuaries The presence of Frank Custa is not a sanctuary ”, Tensia Scadi.
One of the main differences used is the economy, because for him, the “reality” of the sanctuary is that they face difficulties in reaching the end of the month. “These sanctuaries Never help them That was Frank. (…) I am angry that I have been collecting so much money, ”says Scadi, mentions 100,000 donors donated Thegrefg He can restore the ownership of his land.
The content creator points out that the “a true sanctuary” used for that additional money to compensate for the high costs of animal care and safety. “From the moment you want to buy animals and add more to those you have, this stops being a sanctuary,” Scholars say. “Real sanctuaries do not want to get more animals This is because more animals consider high costs and more work. ”
In addition, Mueller emphasizes that sanctuaries recover to prevent the death of animals, and in any case they choose to buy or “exchange them”. “They will never take an animal because it is a good marketing or because it is good in movements or courses,” YoutubberMost criticizes the facts told to Frank. “If you are going to do that, at least I know that I am obvious.”