EU countries may be waived without consideration Asylum requests Transfer to applicants according to the concept of “third secure countries” The proposed by the European Commission on Tuesday.
According to the plan, Socialless citizens who seek asylum They can be easily transferred to a country that is considered “safe,” where they are expected to demand international security, which is very similar Rwanda’s deportation policy of the United Kingdom This was illegally declared by the Supreme Court.
Change of criteria
Authorities of member states may already change Asylum seekers A “third Safer country“, If this is accepted and some rules are respected. According to EU standards, the third secure country does not belong to the European Union The person looking for international security Get a contract with “International Standards”.
There is security in the protection Asylum seekers against persecution And severe damage, respect for the return policy, the possibility of obtaining useful protection under Geneva Conference on Refugee Law And the possibility of accessing a refuge system, with the privilege of education and work permits, in addition to residential rights.
A great example of the use of “third secure country” in the current law 2016 Eu-Turquia Notification: Agreement to allow EU countries (especially to Greece) to the Turkish territory. Up to nowHowever, The applicant needed some kind of connection between the applicant The third country, the previous shelter or the existence of a relative there, thus the exchange is legal.
The Commission is now proposing to change this situation by providing “more flexibility” to member states when deciding how to define the “third secure country”. The connection is no longer compulsory Between the applicant and the third secure country, but the member states can appoint as safe countries, and the asylum applicant has traveled on the way to Europe.
They can appoint countries that can reach an agreement. Next, the central list of “third secure countries” is not forecast at the EU level, they must report the contract. In practice, this means that a asylum applicant will end anywhere in the practice, and that it can be far from his own country or in any country he knows.
The Commission proposes against the resources provided by the asylum applicants Results based on the concept of the third secure country They no longer have the effect of suspending any transmission. Instead, they are applicants who can return to the transferred member states to submit the request.
A controversial political issue
The law is a “specified change” Asylum is the practice of practice It was recognized during the last legislature, as part of the great reform of the European Union’s immigration policy, a contract on migration and asylum. “Secure third countries should play their role“A EU official said during the technical information session on this matter.
At this time, only five of the 27 EU member states have created a list of the third secure countries, most of which are within Europe. But may increase the number of flexibility of the standardsEspecially if third countries reach a contract to accept exchange agreements.
This program is now going to colleges, Parliament And the Council, which represents member states, will accept the respective positions on the planned changes. AfterAccompanied by the European Commission, All three companies will work to accept a common textThis will finally come into effect.
The largest group of European Parliament, the European famous party, said The proposal “Send the correct message” And “this is an important step for creating an efficient, managing and fair asylum system,” said German Erodipuda Lena Dopondin, a spokesman for the Migration Committee.
More opposition is expected from the left section of the European Parliament. Socialists and DemocratsThe greens/and the group on the left are traditionally resistant to the most severe migration standards.
NGOs are also very suspicious of this project. Olivia Chundberg Dies said, “This review will further weaken the access to asylum in Europe, discredit the rights of the people and increase generalized income and arbitrary detention in third countries,” Amnesty International Before the European Union on Migration and asylum.
The Commission did not carry out any formal impact assessment In terms of this project, it is widely consulted with member states, parliament, UNHCR and civil society’s interested parties, but its results are presented in the work document of the Commission services.
(TagstotRanslate) asylum
Story Credit
