The President of the Supreme Court (STF) published Minister Luis Roberto Barroso, in response to an article published by the British magazine The Economist, which recently It criticized the work of the Brazilian court The problem was diagnosed with Minister Alexander de Morais.
In a note published on the highest site, Barroso stressed that it is “an active and active court to avoid the collapse of institutions, as happened in many countries around the world, from Eastern Europe to Latin America.”
The president of the court denied the existence of the “confidence crisis” and stressed that the decisions of the “individual or” monokrati “were later ratified by the other judges” of the Supreme Court. Parroso quotes an example Comment x (former Twitter) last year.
According to the President of the Supreme, the interruption of social networking services in the country occurred because the platform has violated the rules, such as “removing its legal representatives from the country, and not because of any published content.”
“As soon as he got a representative again, he was restored. All the content removal decisions were properly driven and included crime, incitement to crime or preparing for a coup,” he said.
Barroso also noted: “The president of the court never said that the court” defeated Bolsonaro “. It was the voters,” in reference to the defeat of former President Geer Bolsonaro (PL) in the 2022 elections.
Polsonaro
The former president of Brazil, President of the Supreme Court, still stated that the court follows the ruling on the authorities in the courts of the court, instead of taking cases to the plenary session, as happened In the Public Prosecutor’s Office (PGR) In the context of the coup attempt in 2022.
“Changing this is that it will be exceptional. Almost all the court ministers have been insulted by the former president. If the alleged hostility to him may be a criterion for doubt, then the defendant will be sufficient to attack the court until Minister Alexander de Morris will fulfill his role and courage with the support of the court, and not individually.”
As for Barroso, the economist’s article focuses on “more narratives of those who have tried the coup more than the real truth that Brazil is living in full democracy, with the rule of law, brakes, balance of balance and respect for basic rights.”