The State Prosecutor’s Office has requested the Madrid provincial court to archive the reason for the actor against the actor Juan Jose Palesta For sexual occupation “More than reasonable doubts” In the story of the complainant who suffered from a mental disorder and issued contradictory versions.
This is stated in a letter, which has access to EfeIn this, the Advocate’s Office Instructions shows its compliance with the order that ends without a summary of the processing ordered by the judge, and Ask the archive of the reason for being open to the law and his acquaintance.
Barla’s instruction court number 4 last March Appointed the decision without the processing practice Both were investigated by the fact that the accused were missing. Now the provincial court must decide whether to file the reason.
The process started then Complaint filed by 2023 to 47 years Against the actor – it was known with her description in ‘El Bola’ in 2000 and is against another man for two violations in July, and then the woman entered a mental center with a mental eruption.
It is a woman who found a disease He did not take medication at the time.
Palesta (Madrid, 1987) declared, after knowing the outcome of the processing process, which After a year and a half I was very satisfied with “very hard” Many work doors were closed. And believed in the firm file of the process.
Attorney’s Office, according to the judge
Now Attorney’s Office Contacts with provincial court The decision of the judge The instructor and interests are temporarily rejected by “by understanding that the allegation of illegal truth is not recognized from the test of illegal truth.”
The lawyer describes that the complainant suffers from Siddhartha schizophrenia, and that he may have realized the “unrealistic facts at the time and place”, and he did not take his medication due to the intake of some narcotics.
This refers to the possible “deviation of facts” This is not due to the “conscious lie”But this may be the result of a spell that often occurs in this type of schizophrenic. The lawyer recalled that the woman gave “different and/or uncompromising versions of each other”.
“In terms of contradictory versions provided by the complainant, the possibility of the presence of the story is to be considered, in the absence of the renowned and resolved contradiction, the more obvious of the content of the two (…) report, which is not required. Creates more than the legitimate doubts of the total credibility of what happened“He concludes.
From the office of Ospina Abokados, who protects Juan Jose Palesta, they have expressed their satisfaction at this end of the lawyer’s office.
Lawyer Peatris Urearte has described that the prosecutor’s office is “shown in accordance with security proposed arguments” and relying on the archive of the practice, however, that it is necessary to be “very sensible” and respects practical times.
(Taxotrocelate) Gente
Story Credit
