European effort wants to achieve a fight between Kiev and Moscow and to update relations with the US and Trump administration
Roberto Bucklelonga – Vatican City
What happened yesterday at the Lancaster House in London is that it is certainly trying to resolve the question of the war in Ukraine, rather than break it with the United States. After a spectacular clash in the White House between Donald Trump and the Ukrainian president, Volodimir Jelenski, who was broadcast on Friday, was invited to 19 leaders, called British Prime Minister Cair Starmer, aimed at “compromising” between the two banks of Atlantic. In addition, Starmer has tried to soften things: on the one hand, Europe is now called to “to do a heavy work” to break up with the US military umbrella, and on the other hand he wanted to reiterate the essentials of “American support”. And Jelensky repeatedly repeatedly said, “It will be difficult for Ukraine without the US, without the US, to resume the rare earth’s extract of the cooperation agreement between Kiev and Washington in his offices.
There is no decay with Trump
In London, instead of invention, warmths dominate, not just the metaphor. In the end, wisdom succeeded instead of an emergency. To use a game metaphor: If Americans want football, Europeans, especially Britain and France, prefer rugby. A game, by its nature, seek to capture the areas of the field by the intrigues, and the intrigues of the attack, instead of violent penetrations. Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, who led the final results, were not accidental. And, first, it is not surprising that this is a country, and in fact, the additional sociality he has accepted the leadership, but accurately facilitated the United States on the role of “Bridge”.
Alliance of choice
Yesterday’s agreement plans to maintain military aid to Ukraine, while sanctions against Russia are difficult (this has not shown the significant weakness of Moscow forces); Guarantee of Kiev’s sovereignty and protection; Increase your security skills to prevent future invasion; Finally, create a “alliance of volunteers” with a 30 to 40,000 units of units to guarantee peace in Ukraine. This effort, which was promoted by London and Paris, but causes big problems. Which countries participate? At this time everything is in the free stick of individuals. In this sense, Macron has announced that he loves “on our side”, but it is necessary to start from NATO so that Italian prime minister Georgia Meloni has responded in the meantime, not to affect the Atlantic bonding and the unity of the West.
European common security
However, another question: European groups on the border of Russia do not run a risk of increasing conflict instead of providing solid peace maintenance opportunities? Vladimir Putin, president of Kremlin, has already rejected the existence of European troops to maintain peace in Ukraine. In addition, there is no doubt among those close to Moscow that the lack of dissatisfaction with Hungarian President Victor Arban or Slovak prime minister Robert Figo in Europe. Finally, what role will the Atlantic alliance play at this point? His general secretary, Mark Rutte, explained that many countries are ready to increase security costs, which today have less than 2% of GDP for many countries. Elisio’s president also asked, “We are preparing for 3-3.5%of the goal.” Some of the reports that naturally remember the warm issue of these hours will be the subject of debate in the European Council on Thursday, ie funding to the common European security and military industry. Once again, Macron asked the European Commission to give a decree to find a “innovative funding”, such as a joint credit or the European stability mechanism (MEDE), because “we need 200,000 million euros to invest.”
Contract to be limited
The European Union, among the voices of the ground -taking voices, seemed to have difficulty trying to reach the member states separately and the trump’s leadership, with the most difficult positions: Ursula van der Leine, the leader of the commission, declared that “time to make Ukraine into Ukraitan.” In short, on the one hand, if there is an awareness – even though American allies are cautious – by the old continent; On the other hand, beyond the rhetoric of the European leaders, the “Politics” website says, “What is a potential peace plan or the consent of the Starmer and Macron, which is, is not helpful, despite the warmth, it is not helpful or the cause of peace is confirmed.
