There is a great debate on the use of mobile phones in classrooms in classrooms, accusing them of being responsible Lack of attention, bad education results and general interest Most of the youth. Many countries have already introduced policies to control their use in schools and improve both Health As educational results.
Analysis of the situation has been carried out by the University of Birmingham (United Kingdom) and published by the Lancet Newspaper, which has evaluated its impact. School principles Compare the results of adolescents attending schools that ban phones and allow. Against all forecasts, There is no evidence that control school policies are related to well -being Adolescents Mana.
Investigate with unexpected results
The inventions of this new study of Birmingham University, which compares More than a thousand high school students from 30 public centers in the United Kingdom They do not provide evidence that supports the use of school policies that prohibit the use of the phone in its current form on the day of the school day, and these policies indicate that more growth is more effective, while the political approach is required.
School policies on phones that control the daytime use of phones are reduced by adolescents on the phone or on social networks, but the time passing time They are not associated with the general reduction of the time they spend on the phone And on social networks. Restricted school policies on phones, in their current forms, are beneficial in adolescents’ mental health and well -being.
The study concludes that preventive efforts must be considered Other behaviors that affect well -being And they suffer from an increase in the use of telephone or media Sleep, physical activity, efficiencyClassroom behavior and disruptive behavior. Prohibiting mobile phones in class is not related to the best tips or more emotional well -being.
More mobile time, resulting in bad health
Although the results of the study are limited to the use of mobile phones in the classrooms, they agree to schools and those who do not have to recover the time lost when adolescents ‘leaves’ left) they do not reveal the differences. Usually the use and abuse of mobile can be harmful to adolescents.
Research Coordinator, Victoria Good Iyer, “Students’ dreams, the way they communicate in the classroom, exercise they practice, or the time they use their mobile phones They do not differ between the rules of control and the centers that do not contain them. Young people who spend more time on mobile are not usually attached to bad results (they).
Therefore, the current regulations show that it is not enough to solve the problems created by mobile abuse among young people. The expert says it is bluntly briefly Do more than the blocked phones in schools“.
Notes
Wiki Good Iyer, Amy Randawa, Beaman Adap, Harath al-Janafi, Sally Fenton, Kirsty Johns, Maria Michael, Priya Morrison, Paul Patterson, Johnny Quinlan, Alice Citch, Rebecca Dwartoglope, Matthew, Matthew Wat. ‘Their interaction with school phone policies and mental well -being, phone usage and social media use (smart schools): a cross -sectional monitoring inspection’. University of Birmingham. Advice online en en https://research.birmingham.ac.uk/en/publications/school-pone-policies-and-their- Association-Vith-Mental-Winging February 23, 2025.
