Judge ordered to close Fabian Sirez’s ‘Visit of the Lord’

Visual artist Fabian sirez Following the suspension of a federal judge in response to the complaints of Catholics and other Christians, his controversial exhibition in Mexico has called for a struggle on Friday on the day of the closure of the “Lord’s visit” in Mexico.

“We will meet this Friday,” Cyrres declared on social media, Share a picture of “Peaceful Demonstration Against Censorship”.

The protest was set up at 5 pm outside the exhibition of Academia de San Carlosz in the city of Mexico. The 244 -year -old Academy, formerly known as the National Fine Arts School, is connected to the Arts and Design Faculty, which is part of the National Mexico University (UNAM).

February 5, The exhibition contains nine large oil paintings that combine iconic religious themes with sexual images and eroticism. A painting depicts two men in cardinal costume.

Following the complaint, the Christian Lawyers Association (AAC) was reportedly digitally signed by the Christian Lawyers Association (AAC) – it is said to have digitized 9,000 people digitally – with the National Council to prevent discrimination, claiming to have violated the exhibition attack and the constitutional religious rights.

A federal judge A temporary ban was issued to close the exhibition until the issue is legally resolved. Subsequently, the report of the San Carlos Academy and Yunam’s Arts and Design Faculty, they said.

Another trial is scheduled for Tuesday, and it will be decided whether a firm suspension will be given.

Sierrez, 37, denounced the closure of the closure, and argued that his right to freedom of expression was violated.

“The censorship imposed on my job is an act of tolerance, which denies the possibility of debate and to find new ways to explain our relationship with divine.” He said in a statement. “Fear or doctrine cannot be allowed to dictate the limits of art.”

Her report also stated that he had not been notified Protection A constitutional legal action designed to protect individual rights and freedoms.

“Although it is true that (UNAM) acts as a responsible power, it is true that I must have been invited for the Amburo test,” he wrote, “To see my protection and to see my human rights for freedom of expression.”

He also accused the Yamam and the Faculty of Arts and Design, “The next generation of artists are not interested in protecting their work and freedom of expression.”

Many LGP+ rights organizations, including Kailatino and the Altarde AC, have expressed their support for both the artist and Friday opposition – some say that this may be a stage for a major debate on the borders of art and religious respect in Mexican society.

Gaylatino condemned the censorship, saying that it was “an attempt to destroy voices that can be seen and to establish a state of denying the rights of the people of sex and gender diversity.”

A group of Christian lawyers argued that “the need for freedom is defined by the need for freedom” that the Catholics’ religious beliefs, symbols, and the ITY Ravas should not be violated or insulted.

This is not the first time that Sirez’s work stimulates controversy. In 2019, his painting “Revolution,” A naked Emiliano Jabata depicts the hay heels and pink sooraro, Sparked demonstrations When the Fine Arts is displayed in the Palace. Jabada’s descendants threatened legal action, When LGBTQ+ supporters gathered in the protection of the artist.

Recently, on February 19, the Catholic opponents entered the gallery and made a human barrier before being considered “offensive images”, and the “Lord’s Visit” – in Spanish, was closed as a “La Venida Del Chinese”.

Cyrres has been negative, “Today it is censored, but tomorrow it may be any other art manifestation that challenges the established thought.”

With reports from UniversalOvarian Political animal And TV ostega