world Children are bornExcessive realistic dolls have acquired real children on social networks, and recently, they have reached the courts. What started as a cultural and emotional phenomenon now generates conflicts that raise complex issues of the law.
One of the cases that gained a bad reputation involves a couple, after the end of the relationship, they started competing with them “Protects” From a doll again. According to the lawyer and influencer Susanna Ferrera, whom the agent concerned is searching for, the predicament exceeds the possession of the object, including the organization “coexistence” With the doll (referred to as “a daughter born again”), dividing the costs with the doll and Layette, and A dispute over the management of children’s profiles born on social networks.
Susanna Ferrera confirmed that this is not a joke online, however “Real demands” This reflects “the madness of society” and directly affects the legal profession. The doll profile is seen on social networks as a “Digital Assets currently”Because it generates participation, advertising and profits.
“Instagram should be the child of the two people. The account is one of the digital assets today, so it can also be considered a heritage,” Susanna said.
Legal perspective
Despite the emotional association that teachers develop through these dolls, the Legal Analysis Center lies in another case of Baby Reborn. For experts, the main difference between conflicts involved in children, animals and dolls that are born again are Legal nature.
children “Humans with legal personality, law topics”He is protected by the Federal Constitution and the statute of the child and adolescents (ECA), where all guarantees revolve around “Better interest for the child”.
Animals, although the current civil law still treats them as “Good property”He had an emotional bond with the increasingly recognized teachers by the judiciary. The courts, including the Upper Court of Justice, recognized the decisions that regulate coexistence through Joint guard.
A specific case
a report CNN Talk to experts who reside the scenario and point to the type of approach that justice – or cannot – adopt these conflicts.
From the expert’s point of view, a child is born again goal. He does not have a personality and has no life and “No law”. Vanessa Baifa, a family law expert, confirms that the doll “It is not real and has no real needs.”
“He does not feed, does not go to a small school, does not lose clothes, and does not dirty diapers.”
Looking at this legal nature, the experts assert: It is so Legally Talk about Protect The traditional sense of children is born again.
According to Kevin Soussa, the legal lawyer, from a legal point of view, there is no technical possibility for other issues such as alimony, because alimony aims to meet the need for a person who cannot continue, a hypothesis that does not apply to a doll.
“There, in my view, how do we talk a law about guarding, and the traditional pension in the traditional senseKevin said.
Tatiana Nauman, a family law specialist, confirms this current.
“I understand that this is a legally impossible request while the dolls are not subject to the law. There is no way to equality, for example, with pets, in fact legal issues and are considered by the court in custody cases,” says Nauman.
Focus on heritage and possession
Although it is impossible to apply traditional concepts of family law such as custody and pensions, the judiciary is called to deal with these disputes. Experts suggest that the performance of justice requires “A lot of caution”.
“The legal approach should be within “Legal Borders”Treating the situation as the conflict on a He says Kevin mentions the possibility of creating a “Voluntary buildings from this mobile good”.
In addition to the legal field, issues that involve children also generate a re -highlighting social and psychological issues. Experts realize that there “The emotional attachment to respect” By two teachers.
For Vaissa Paviva, it can have such cases, which involve an unlimited object, a priority service “Psychological and Social”. You evaluate that these situations may reflect questions from “mind” In difficult times.
“The judiciary cannot be a comfortable machine, and a doll is conflict,” says Piva.
In response to the controversy
Parallel to conflicts in court, the repercussions of the use of children’s use of children are born again in public places and tendencies Three bills At the National Congress.
The proposal aims to create restrictions on the use of these dolls, to forbid Use it to obtain benefits such as healthy (general or private) or favorite lines.
Some fixed and mobile seeks to describe how Administrative violation Simulating the presence of a child with advantages, predicting fines that may vary from five to 20 wages minimum.
