The Strasburg court rejected the request Carlos Quadrado, one of the three players of Arandina They were subjected to joint sexual harassment in November 2017 for a 15 -year -old child.
European judges have announced that the complaint of square Santos, which requested the Supreme Court’s verdict in November 2022, was sentenced to nine years in prison, like two other defendants -like two other defendants. Was spontaneous and contradictory with the punishment of March 2020 Clemente of the High Court of the High Court of Castilla Y. Leon (DSJCL).
Especially what he wanted, the European Human Rights Court (X “Asymmetrical section” or “wrote Romeo and Julietta” It is allowed to avoid criminalization of sexual activity among young adolescents with similar maturity.
However, The results of the ECHR released this Thursday support the peak explanationEven to recognize that there were different explanations about its use at the time of the square case.
On the one hand, it emphasizes that its purpose is not to change the courts of a country, which They are to solve the problems of the interpretation of the inner lawMoreover, the Supreme Court is the evolution of the judiciary, and that it is not spontaneously or violated the principle of legal determination.
After all, he emphasizes that the other explanations that may be in that section in the past are a mitigation situation, They were for the situations of materially different sexual offenses They are not for an extravagance determined that they are square and the other two players of Arundina.
The victim was 15 years old, when three players went to the ground where they shared, had relationships with him Initially they qualified as sexual occupations By the provincial court of Burkos, each of them denounced up to 20 years, but the DSJCL demanded sexual abuse and reduced the punishment for four years.
That reduction was not only demanding crimes in sexual abuse, but also the use of the “Romeo and Julietta Division”. Its interpretation is different by different courts It was a punishment of the peak in January 2024, which from then to syncs the judiciary.
ECHR also rejects the argument of the square that the judges of the supreme have corrected Platlet to the DSJCL and Fines are hard because of media exposure He kept the case and repeatedly states that the facts differ clearly from others, and he wanted to compare himself.
In his complaint, former Arandina footballer also complained “Only yes it is” the peak judgment referred to, which was accepted in 2022That is, when the facts that have been filed against him have already taken place, he considers his right to not be punished for a violation that is not.
However, if the Supreme Court refers to the law, it is, the European judges Apostle This allowed him to use the most favorable new lawBecause it reduced ten to nine years.
