Federal Representatives Alfredo Jasbar (UNIãO Brasil-Aal) and Sâmia Bomfim (PSOL-SP), were discussed, Friday (09), in The great debate (From Monday to Friday, 11 pm), about a possible friction that may generate with the House of Representatives the decision of most of the first-class ministers of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) to partially suspend criminal action against Alexander Ramjim.
The first degree of STF formed a majority to partially maintain it Criminal action against Alexander Ramjim (PL-RJ) In the process of the coup plan.
The decision occurs after the House of Representatives decided to suspend the procedure completely.
For Alfredo Gaspar, presented by the opinion approved by the deputies who defended the suspension of the entire process against a branch, the STF position strikes the powers of the House of Representatives and contradicts the choice of 305 favorable deputies for the overall declaration to work against the branch.
“We are prevented from estimating all the facts related to Parliament. Parliament does not recognize this at all, according to Article 53 in Paragraph 3, when it says that it may attach the criminal procedure for all crimes after the diploma.”
GASPAR states that there is a major variation between the defendants and others for the work of January 8.
“The Supreme Court said that the House of Representatives cannot monitor any comment on three crimes presented in the complaint, while many people are reported on January 8 through these crimes, such as the person looking for the lips of this monument before the Supreme Court. It is very big,” he said.
For Mrs. Samia Bomfim, parliamentarians who returned to suspend the procedure against a branch already have been a competition for the judiciary and that, of course, it will be overthrown in STF.
“In addition to a strong controversy over this reading that the five crimes that were calculated for the branch will be after the diploma, because we are talking about the sides when he was the director of Abyan (the Brazilian Intelligence Agency), when he was not graduated after a deputy, he has another report that I consider very severe, and also includes the box.”
PSOL deputy states that the idea was to get rid of a five -crime coup survey and can get rid of other names, such as Jair Bolsonaro, Augusto Heleno, General Braga Neto and Almir Garnier.
He says: “All the participants in the essence of the main coup and also others, from the other seven nuclei, who are in this investigation into the Supreme Court. There are those who want the conflicting climate between Congress and the Supreme Court,” he says.
The Supreme Council to maintain a lawsuit against a deputy for three crimes: a violent cancellation of democratic law; State coup; And the criminal organization.
Consequently, accusations will be canceled due to qualified damage crimes and the deterioration of the included heritage.
The amendment occurred because, according to the appearance of the Prosecutor’s Office, these crimes were committed after the branch, when the constitution allows the suspension of criminal procedures against parliamentarians.
