Union Public Prosecutor (AgoOn Friday (9), I entered a request in the Federal Court to include Six companies and eight people In the preventive measures provided against associations that were investigated through irregular discounts on the benefits of retirees and retirees at the National Social Security Institute (Inss).
Companies and their partners who appear in the new demand are accused of being an intermediary of embezzlement of unjustified advantages for the general agents associated with INSS and other related individuals. To date, it is estimated that transferring the unjustified amounts to these public agents gives $ 23.8 million.
A AGU also requires the mass of goods Among the partners of these companies on the basis that “the legal entities were used as a tool for illegal practices of a criminal, administrative and civil nature, as a way to raise the advantages of resources extracted in an unjustified way from the benefits of retirees and retirees.”
“The ongoing investigations reveal strong evidence that the aforementioned companies participated directly in the broker of the millionaire values,” he says. hunger In modification. “This financial engineering supported the criminal planWhich consists of an unjustified amount of amounts that are unjustified by the associations and pay unlawful advantages for public agents who allowed or facilitated these rivalries. “
Resource blockade
Thursday (8), AGU has provided a precautionary procedure to request a banned property and real estate property In order R 2.56 billion dollars against 12 union entities (And its leaders) Investigation through the irregular discounts that were conducted for retirees and retirees.
In general, the request for banning goods includes twelve entities, including seven runners in the eleven pf list. AGU also requested that tax and banking services be violated for these entities, seizing involved passports and suspending their activities.
According to Al -Ittihad’s lawyer, Jorge Messias, two groups of the 12 entities that were investigated were identified: The first is formed by entities that have strong evidence to be created exclusively for the purpose of fraud and the second group includes those that bear the signs of paying bribery to federal public agents.
