Another night of tensions between India and Pakistan

Guglielmo Gallone – Vatican Ciudad

This is not the first time that India has responded militarily to the terrorist attacks committed by armed groups accused of support from Pakistan. However, the Sindoor operation launched on Wednesday night against what New Delhi called “nine terrorist sites” in Pakistan is different from its 2016 and 2016 predecessors at least in three aspects.

Intensive and coordinated operation

The first: The attack appears to have participated in the three Indian armed forces, that is, the army, the naval and the Air Force, indicating an intensive and coordinated operation. This morning, the Pakistani army “demolishing the 25 Israeli manufacturing drone” sent from India to “technical means”, but also with armed responses “, while the Indian Ministry of Defense claimed that it neutralized drones and missiles launched at night by Islam. Also along the control line that works as borders in Kashmir, there was another night of skirmishes, where the Indian and Pakistani soldiers exchanged shots this morning. The Indian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, explained that he has no intention to climb the situation, but added that “if there is any military attack against India, the answer will be very firm.”

Not only Kashmir

Here, a second worker plays that the Sindoor operation is unpublished as much as it is complicated, and it is the fact that he had not only the goal of basketball, but also other sites such as the city of Bahawalpur, where a mosque and energy generation plants and its dams were attacked, and expanded the scope of its arrival in relation to previous sites. On the Pakistani side, at the present time, yesterday’s victims’ personalities, who are preserved in 26 fatal civilians, have not been updated, while the Indian Foreign Ministry stated today that the balance of the Pakistani fire in the Indian part of Kashmir has risen to 13 dead civilians and 59 of the injured.

International context

Finally, there is the fact that the escalation between the nuclear forces occurs in a multi -polarized international context. In response, international reactions did not wait. The President of the United Nations General Assembly, Flemon Yang, announced himself “deeply concerned” by ascending and asking “the maximum moderation and immediate collapse by both parties.” The United States, China and Russia repeated the urgent need for violation. Turkey talked about the “risks of complete war”, while Kaja Callas condemned Kaja Kalas, “the terrible terrorist attack it committed in Bahmeg (Jamo and Kashmir) on April 22 and the death of innocent civilians.” The least, full of its cultural identity, with the ethnic majority of the imported origin, slipping and traditions of religiosity, still contains its breath in the hope that it is not part of the “Third World War to the pieces” that Francis is tired of pop.