With the advent of the April Exhibition in Seville, one of the most identical and anticipated ceremonies of Andalusia, there are a series of discussions and reflections on the use of social networks during these mass events. In recent years, The hashtag of #Papagorda has become a virus event Dictoc, Twitter (now X), Instagram and Facebook, but not accurate for positive reasons.
Since 2019, the hashtag of #Papagorda has been used To spread the content associated with those who are in a transparent state of drinking During exhibitions, many times with the intention of mocking or mocking people who appear in videos. Viralization of these contents Has created anxiety among the authorities And agencies responsible for ensuring the basic rights of the people, such as the Audiovisual Council (CAA) of Andalusia.
The CAA, in its most recent report, recalled the risks associated with the publication and spread of videos, in which anonymous people appear drunk without their permission. These contents are, Registered several times without permission and shared on social networksThey can create illegal interference in rights such as respect, intimacy and image.
The right to respect, personal and family privacy, and the film is protected by the Spanish Constitution and created in Organic Law in 1/1982. These laws are clearly established when the use of a person’s image is considered an illegal interference. The massive distribution of these videos, in addition, increases the risk of damage to their reputation and personal well -being.
Cheville Exhibition under the magnitude of the hashtag #Papagorda
During the Seville Exhibition of 2024, the hashtag#Papakorta 24 reached achievement statistics on social networks. According to the data of CAA analysis, 2,379 outputs were recorded with this hashtag on DictokIt creates a total of 74 million visualizations worldwide, of which 67 million are similar to Spain. These numbers reflect the impact and dosage of the event, which was established as one of the 20 mostly used hashtags in those days.
The use of these sites has been allowed to turn videos into viral in a few hours, but has also prompted the increasing refusal among users. Many Internet users express their concern over legal and ethical impacts Share content that can violate fundamental rights. In some cases, the records are filmed, distant or shot without any contact with the recorders, which make the problem worse.
Read
Worked as a well -known case and precedent Allow 10,000 euros imposed by Spain’s Agency for Data Protection (AEPD). Due to the spread of the social networks of a recorded video without consent, a person can be identified as a drinking state on public roads, supported by a tank and with his dog. This example shows how important legal effects of videos can have important legal consequences without recognition.
