This Sunday (27), the Electoral Court in São Paulo convicted Partpo Marshall (PRTB) For the second time this year. A For the first time it was on April 21 From 2025.
In both resolutions in the first electoral area of Sao Paulo, Judge Antonio Maria Pattino Zorers decided that Marshall was not qualified for eight years.
In the note, Pablo Marshall stated He said, “The decision is temporary. We have fulfilled all legal requirements during the campaign. I trust in court and I am sure we will reflect. “
Understanding the differences in the sentences:
What is the difference in penalties?
In the first condemnation, Marshall was sentenced to eight years in prison. This time, the specified decision is not qualified for an eight -year and pays a fine of $ 420,000 to not comply with the irritable order.
Is there no no presence?
A CNN He spoke to Dr. Isabel Motta, a lawyer who specializes in law and the electoral process, explained that there were no legal penalties.
“The impaired punishment is like Polsonaro, as it does not add in time, that is, it is not an addition to another. It is concerned with the elections. If you have ten convictions, it will be at the same time of the elections,” he explained.
What is the difference in accusations?
In April, Marshall was condemned to abuse the political authority, the economic authority, the abuse of the media, and the unlawful collection of donations.
At that time, according to the judge, Businessman offered political support to strengthen the campaign Election of the candidates for the consultant through the videos released on the Internet. The examination will cost $ 5,000. These requests were submitted by video clips published on social networks.
In one of the recordings, Marshall said:
“I am competing for unfair elections here as I do not use public funds and spend 100 million dollars on the misleading advertisement, and here I want to ask you a question: You know someone who wants to be a member of the council, a candidate, does not meet on the left, and will send the left.
to CNN interviewsand The program was broadcast on March 22, 2025, Pablo Marshall said that he did the video, but he was warned by his legal team not to continue the idea: “This has not been achieved, there is no embodiment of him,” he told the businessman journalists from CNN Clarisa Olivira and Pedro Vansssso.
In today’s decision, Judge Marshall is accused of abuse of use of media misuse, seizing illegal resources of resources and abuse of economic power.
According to the judge, Marçal collaborators collaborated to spread content on social networks, using the “pieces” system and short videos.
User register, learn to do it, and thus, after publishing, he started getting views. Depending on the amount of views, it was assigned by Marçal or its companies.
The judge realizes that “paying these” properties “of the content with financial resources would prevent inspection by the electoral court for its origin and destination.”
In addition, the judge cites gifts, such as CAPS, which has been delivered after clouds to those who promote voters.
What parties involved in procedures?
The first decision was taken by the Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB), Guilherme Boulos and Amor for the São Paulo Coalition (PSOL/REDE Union, Brazil from Al -Ittihad Al -Amal/PDT).
The second condemnation was the Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB), the Tabata Amrat Party, who is also a candidate for the city of Sao Paulo in 2024. Tabana Amar said “The electoral judge’s penalty again puts restrictions on those who try to overcome the barriers imposed by electoral justice to ensure that the elections are working fairly. The response to the procedure provided by PSB indicates that nothing shows to win the claim and those who are afraid must bear officials.”
